Tuesday 18 December 2018

Week 5 Reflection

Dance physical vs programming.  Make the link...

Video - TedEx (Scratch)
Simple - kids use
Can be interactive
Can make own or use what is already there
Fluent with the technology - expressing themselves and their ideas using the technology

Scratch - comuptational thinking and visual art

Santatracker - on scratch

8 Progress Outcomes of the Computationsal Thinking technology area
What extent are they covered by todays activities

We thought Level 3 others thought it moved further in to level 4


Digital Passport - look into this.  Is is better than google educator??
Send to www.digitalpassport.co.nz
If you need your school's signup code email:
digitalpassport@themindlab.com with your school's name and your teacher registration number

Focus on digital curriculum not digital learning

Leadership

tinyurl.com/TMLScholarTips to find out how
Google Scholar will show which articles are in "The Mind Lab Library"
Google scholar is a wide search
Quotation marks indicates that it has an APA citation
"Star" will put it into my library
Versions are different places it is found

Are the resources in the mind lab library useful
No.  They seem to be based more around American and Asian research.  Predominantly overseas examples rather than local.  You really need to have a prescriptive goal/purpose and use the search engine in this way.

Knowledge is not understanding - the backwards bike eg

Growth Mindset
Everyone goes through stages where they are in and out of the growth mindset
When students believe they can get smarter, they understand that effort makes them stronger. Therefore they put in extra time and effort, and that leads to higher achievement

Fundatmental capability to learn can be taught
https://www.developgoodhabits.com/fixed-mindset-vs-growth-mindset/



TedEx Talk - Keir



STOP MOTION
Animation
iStop Motion for iPhones
Mashable


Refelction Week 6

Official Closure will be closed 21 Dec to Jan 6th then back into sessions

Leadership 1 - Critically analyse the leadershp of a change initiative that you were involved with in the past.  Then plan your lweadersip of a fture change intiative.  Identify the leadership theories, styles and attributes used and evaluate theri effectiveness.

Initial due date 5th February.

#MaoriMediumLeadership Theories - Tua Rangatira, Tuakana Teina, Kahikatea, Taita ako, Kia eke panuku
#PedagogicalLeadership - educational approach
#ServantLeadership - empower the follower
#TransformationLeadership - change is involved

Pedagogical Leadership - coggle

Theory - overarching idea
Style - How you put it into practice

My Styles of Leadership from the UK Website...
Your scores are as follows:

Authoritarian 25
Procedural 27
Transformational 36
Participative 39
Laissez-Faire 37

Please note down your scores then see below.
Test results: explanations of the different styles of leadership

Style

Authoritarian

Procedural

Transformational

Participative

Laissez-faire

Other names

Autocratic
Transactional: the “transaction” is that the organisation rewards (pays) the team, in return for their work & compliance.
Task-orientated
Bureaucratic
Managerial
Also related to authoritarian
Charismatic leadership is very similar, where the leader depends on his/her charisma & energy to inspire staff.
Democratic or Consulting

Delegative.
Servant: A leader who is not formally recognized. Leads just by meeting the needs of the team. Whole team is involved in decisions.

Example

Napoleon
Florence Nightingale
Barack Obama
Nelson Mandela
Mahatma Gandhi

Amount of control

High: telling, directing, controlling.High: telling, directing, controlling.Medium: selling,  reasoning, persuading,   delegating.Medium: selling,  reasoning,  persuading,  consulting.Low: advising, counseling, participating, observing, joining.

What it involves

The leader has a lot of power over team members & has the right to reward good performance or punish members if they don't reach the agreed standard.
They tell their team what they want done & how without often asking for advice from team members. Team members are given little opportunity to make suggestions, even if these would be in the team's interest.
It should normally only be used occasionally
The focus is on short-term tasks so it's more a a method of managing rather a true leadership style
Work “by the book”: team members follow procedures precisely. 
Focuses only on getting the job done, & can be quite autocratic. 
Little thought given to the well-being of team members
Task Orientated vs relationship orientated: both procedural & transformational leaders are usually needed. "managers" focus on tasks while "leaders" focus on people.
The leader inspires team with their vision of what should happen. They supply the main goal, but allow members to choose their own way of reaching it.
The leader is totally focused on organizing, supporting & developing the team
The leader is always looking for ideas that move towards the organisation’s vision.
Transformation leaders are very visible, & spend lot of time communicating. Communication is the basis for achievement by focusing the group on the required outcome. They don’t necessarily lead from the front, as they tend to delegate responsibility.
Builds consensus through participation: the leader makes the final decision, but the team to contribute to the decision-making process.
The leader asks the team's opinions & uses these to make decisions. The team is kept informed & are allowed to discuss & propose changes to policy.
The leader can't know everything: this is why you employ skillful team members.
This style is not a sign of weakness, more a sign of strength your team will respect.
Team members make the decisions but leader is still responsible for these.
Leader asks for the team's opinions. Team is left to make its own decisions which are then sanctioned by the leader.
Leader participates in the discussion as a normal team member & agrees in advance to carry out whatever decision the group makes. Team members are left to get on with their tasks.
Effective if the leader monitors what is being achieved & regularly communicates this back to the team. 

When 
used

Works well when you're short on time, & team is well motivated
For some routine & unskilled tasks.
In a crisis.
With difficult employees.
Tasks requiring great attention to detail.
Appropriate for work involving safety risks such as working with machinery or where large sums of moneyare involved.

This is the most common modern leadership style.
When organisational flexibility & a sense of individual responsibility is needed,
Where team working is essential
When quality is more important than speed or productivity.
When you have confidence & trust in your team.
Where team members are experienced & skilled; they can analyse the situation & determine what needs to be done & how to do it. (e.g. team of research scientists).

Pros

Can achieve results quickly
In research done on this groups were found to be most productive under autocratic, but if the leader was absent work stopped.
Clearly defines the tasks & the roles required.
Puts structures in placeplanning, organization & monitoring is usually good.
Motivates the team to be effective & efficient.
Tends to lead to good teamwork & creative collaboration.
The enthusiasm & energy of a transformational leader is often infectious.
Can communicate an inspirational vision of the future
Mutual benefit:allows members to feel part of the team & leader to make better decisions.
Members feel in control & motivated to work hardIncreases job satisfaction by involving the team in decisions. Helps to develop team members' skills.
Most consistent in quality & productivity
Increasingly necessary in a world where leaders achieve power on the basis of their ideals & values.
You can't do everything so you have to set priorities& delegate some tasks.

Cons

Team doesn't gain from creativity & knowledge of members, so benefits of teamwork are lost.
Staff can't improve their job satisfaction& may resent the way they are treated leading to high absenteeism & staff turnover.
Serious limitations but still much used. Sometimes thought of as bullying but this isn't a valid authoritarian style.
The inflexibility & high levels of control exerted can demoralize team members, & reduce the organisation's ability to react to changing circumstances
Similar problems to autocratic leadership: difficulties in motivating & retaining team members.
Procedural & transformational leadership are symbiotic. The procedural leaders (managers) ensure routine work is done well, while the transformational leaders focus on initiatives that add value. The transformational leader focuses on the big picture, but needs to be surrounded by people who take care of the details.
Taken to extremes, can lead to failure to achieve the team's goals.
This style may result in indecision, & some team members may be left feeling confused & leaderless.
As participation takes time things may happen more slowly than with an autocratic approach, but often the end result is better.
Often less effective in terms of quality and productivitythan other methods.
Not good in competitive situations.
Often happens naturally in situations where managers are not exerting sufficient control.

No one leadership style is correct.  Situational theories are used dependant on a number of factors such as situation, people, task, organisation environmental variables.


Attempt to influence = leadership
Only way you impacts performance of others is through your behaviour
Depends on your behaviour in a situation.  Match to the performance needs of the group
Ability and willingness needs to be assessed.  Coaching and mentoring is impt.  Up to us to help them grow.

Situational Leadership
Not different strokes for different folk rather...
Different strokes for the same folk depending on task maturity and experience.







Goleman Leadership Styles
Click here to download


Theories - Maori Medium, Pedagogical, Servant, Tarnsformational

Styles - Supporting, coaching, delegating, directinf, coercive, authoritative, affiliative, democratic,

Attributes - Key competentics, 21st century skills, growth mindset (not there yet, constructive feedback, resilience etc)
Eg:
Theory: I am a transformational leader
My styles are visionary, directing,
My attributes are inspiring, communication, managing self, participating and conritbuting,

Critical Reflection - prep for Leadership 1


Digital

3D Printng so diverse and we have no real idea of where it will go
SculptGL - 3D model to make

We are in a 3D world so 3D printing/modelling is essential and allows for the spatial ability requirements.
Spatial Ability - one of the main components of human intelligence.  Impt for several occupations or educational programs and training.  Spatial ability is pervasive, which means that we need it for almost each activity in everyday life.

Free 3D Modelling software
PLAY PLAY PLAY!!!

Week 6 Prep

School is finished but doinf this work is so very tiring also!

I have set up the Tinkercad account and played around but I can't find the tutorial on coffee bag jaws.....  Will be more useful with a mouse.  Hopefully be better explained in class.


Leadership Theories and Styles - Dr David Parsons

  • Early days they were person focused - traits or skills of leadership
  • Move to more role focused in the 50's and 60's
    • behaviours
    • tasks
  • Process focused
    • how influence others
    • contexts and relationships
  • 7 theories
    • transactional - Burns - simple.  Leader approaches follower to exchange one thing for another
    • transformational - Burns - more complex, leader engages with followers motive and potential.  They empower the follower
    • pedagogical - NZ focused - educational.  Leaders establish an academic mission.  THey monitor and feedback on teaching an learning.  More than just the responsibility of the principal
    • distributed - more than just sharing, it is the collected interactions.  Situation provides context AND defines leadership
    • servant - Greenleaf - proven and trusted in servants.  Share awareness, listen, pursuasion etc.  Something involving a number of different styles.  Teaching uses - unleashing the talents of others
    • Tu Rangatira - NZ - different sytles - innovation and vision.  Stitches in the cloak of the leader - range of roles eg guardian, manager, visionary, learner, worker, networker, advocate.  Range of different styles.  Leadershp nand management are not the same 
    • situational - old theory. adapts to the maturity of the followers (experiences and capabiolities).  Followers are immature - adopt a directing approach but as they improve, you move through coaching, supporting and delegating.
  • Means - different theories encompass different sytles in practice.  Use a numbe rof styles
  • Early studies identified - Democratic, autocratic and permissive
  • More recent and more popular - coercive, authoritative, affiliative, democrati, pacesetting, coaching.  
  • Goleman linked to emotional intelligence
    • More styles the better.  4 most impt - authoritative, democratic, affilitative and coaching as most effective and can switch between them easily
  • Reinforces ideas that different styles can be used at once to meet the situation

Tuesday 11 December 2018

Week 5 Prep

The Poetry of Programming

This made programming seem very simple.  It another. different language to understand but it can be done.  Kids are good at this and do it easily.  Think more like a child.

I use an example of this when I teach electricity.  Cars on the race track going around obstacles.


Leadership attributes

I read a number of different articles but didn't really like any of them in terms of what I was looking for at that time.  There were points from all that were useful but nothing really stood out. 

Leadership attributes of enrollment managers in higher education institutions in the united states

  • The changing demographics of today’s workforce is impacting the numbers of qualified leaders and changing the skills necessary for leaders to succeed 
  • Additionally, the leadership traits necessary for future leaders is changing
  • "CCL identified the seven leadership skills viewed as important for future leaders as leading employees, strategic planning, inspiring commitment, managing change, resourcefulness, being a quick learner, and doing whatever it takes (Leslie, 2009)"
  •  leaders lack the skills they need to be effective and that ‘resourcefulness’ , defined as working effectively with top management, was the only skill that was found to be a top ten current skill and a top ten needed skill.

Universally enforced attributes of leadership with current prevalent leadership theories taught at texas A&M university
  • Researchers are questioning exactly which competencies are needed to be an effective global leader across cultures
  • It is concluded Transformational and Charismatic leadership theories taught at Texas A&M are universally endorsed theories, while behavioral leadership, task and relationship competencies, are not considered important for westernized leadership. This has profound impacts on the leadership education community.
  • The question becomes: should leadership programs focus more on global leadership theories and competencies?
  • The definition of leadership held by GLOBE researchers is "the ability of an individual to influence, motivate and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organizations of which they are members" (House et al., 2002, p. 5).














Citation
  • Presswood, K. R. (2011). Leadership attributes of enrollment managers in higher education institutions in the united states (Order No. 3467586). Available from Education Collection. (883387063). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/883387063?accountid=196279
  • Leslie, J. (2009). The leadership gap. Center for Creative Leadership. http://www.ccl.org/leadership/pdf/research/leadershipGap.pdf
  • Muenich, J., & Williams, J. (2013). Universally enforced attributes of leadership with current prevalent leadership theories taught at texas A&M university. NACTA Journal, 57(3), 45-50. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1445180917?accountid=196279
  • House, R.J., P.J. Hanges, M. Javidan and P.W. Dorfrnan 2002. Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business (31), 3-10.

Tuesday 4 December 2018

Week 4 Reflection

In class

Referencing and accessing the MindLab e-library

APA referencing - how to use it correctly for assignments
Always reference things you use even if it isn't a direct quote.

Quote from an ebook:
(Wheeler, Steve and Gerver, 2015) I believe that for educators everywhere, the challenge is to take devices that have the potential for great distraction and boldly appropriate them as tools that can inspire learners, focus their minds, and engage them in learning. 

Wheeler, Steve, and Richard Gerver. Learning with 'e's : Educational theory and practice in the digital age, Crown House Publishing, 2015. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/themindlab/detail.action?docID=1918927.
Created from themindlab on 2018-12-04 20:12:43.


Constuctionism - learn by making
Constructivism - constructing something in my head, with someone or alone

Scratch or Makeymakey activity

Co-operation: Idea and concept you can work together but at the end your work does not depend on another person to be complete.
Collaboration: Both parties must complete their work for it to be complete.

Pot luck dinner eg.  Everyone brings an ingredient and dishes are made from the ingredients that are supplied.  This is both constructiveist and constructionist.

Makeymakey task - collaborative and/or coperative
Create a slideset for reflection on this.

Completed and on The Mind Lab Google+ Community.


Collaboration Ruberic

Collaboration: Rubric

The more students are working collaboratively, the higher their score:


1 * Students are NOT required to work together in pairs or groups.

2 * Students DO work together
   * BUT they DO NOT have shared responsibility.

3 * Students DO have shared responsibility
   * BUT they ARE NOT required to make substantive decisions together.

4 * Students DO have shared responsibility
   *AND they DO make substantive decisions together about the content, process, or product of their work
   * BUT their work is not interdependent.

5 * Students DO have shared responsibility
   * AND they DO make substantive decisions together about the content, process, or product of their work
   * AND their work is interdependent.

Week 4 Preparation

Top 10 Learning Theories for Digital and Colloaborative Learning

  • Conditioning
    • Pavlov and Skinner
    • Feedback
    • Behaviour and reinforcement focussed
  • Connectionism and the Law of Effect
    • Stimulus and response
    • Incremental learning
    • Reinforcement
    • Thorndike
  • Progressive Education
    • Dewey
    • Self Coverning
    • Co-operation
    • Experiential learning
  • Constructivism: Social Development Theory
    • Vygotsky
    • Social Learning
    • Zone of proximal development
    • More knowledgable other
    • Teacher is facilitator not content provider
  • Constructiveism: Equilibration
    • Piaget
    • Intelligentce
    • Drive towards balance with environment
    • 4 stages of development - sensory, preoperational, concrete, formal
    • Educational environment should provide opportunity for discovery
  • Socical Cognitive Theory
    • Bandura
    • Observation and modelling can give same learning exerpience as direct experience
    • Teachers act as models
    • Media can affect behaviour in a negative way
  • Situated Learning/Cognition
    • Seely Brown
    • Learning is embedded in activity, context and culture in which it is learned
    • Learning is about performace not just accumulation of knowledge
  • Community of Practice
    • Lave and Wenger
    • 3 components - domain, community and practice
    • Learning is unintentional
    • About social relationship; co-operation
  • Constructionism
    • Papert
    • Learning by doing.
    • Abstract thinking
  • Connectivism
    • Siemens
    • Learning theory for digital age
    • New opportunities to learn and share information
    • Can take place across many dimensions
    • How does learning effect technology not just technology effect learning